Difference between revisions of "DNA Melting Report Requirements"

From Course Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Report outline)
(Report outline)
Line 24: Line 24:
 
#* Include a table of model parameters and confidence intervals for each experimental run.
 
#* Include a table of model parameters and confidence intervals for each experimental run.
 
#* Use the smallest possible number of fluorescence voltage vs. temperature plots to compare the model with best-fit parameters to your data and a simulated result obtained from DINAmelt or another melting curve simulator.
 
#* Use the smallest possible number of fluorescence voltage vs. temperature plots to compare the model with best-fit parameters to your data and a simulated result obtained from DINAmelt or another melting curve simulator.
#* Either plot residuals versus time, temperature, and fluorescence, '''or''' use best-fit parameters to transform the fluorescence voltage into dsDNA fraction versus temperature for at least one experimental run.
+
#* Plot one of the following:
 +
#** residuals versus time, temperature, and fluorescence, '''or'''  
 +
#** use best-fit parameters to transform the fluorescence voltage into dsDNA fraction versus temperature for at least one experimental run.
 
#* Comment on strengths and shortcomings of the model.
 
#* Comment on strengths and shortcomings of the model.
 +
#** Discuss validity of underlying assumptions.
 +
#** Discuss the residuals (or transformed data) plot and parameter confidence intervals.
 
# Unknown sample determination:  
 
# Unknown sample determination:  
 
#* Plot results for unknown sample, including other samples for comparison.
 
#* Plot results for unknown sample, including other samples for comparison.

Revision as of 03:46, 16 November 2012

20.309: Biological Instrumentation and Measurement

ImageBar 774.jpg


Format

  • One group member must submit a single PDF file no more than 20 MB to Stellar before the deadline.
  • The name of the submitted file must consist of the last name of each group member separated by underscores: <LastName1>_<LastName2>_<LastName2>.pdf
  • Include computer code in an appendix at the end of the file. Do not submit code separately.
  • All plots must be presented properly, including a descriptive title, axis labels, and legend.
  • Begin the report with a cover page the lists the full names of all group members, your assigned DNA sample number, the type of investigation (length/ionic strength/complementarity), and a haiku about DNA melting curves.


Failure to follow the format guidelines will result in ridiculously large grade penalties

Report outline

  1. Abstract:
    • In one paragraph of less than six sentences, summarize the investigation you undertook and key results.
  2. Raw data
    • Plot all of your group's raw data, fluorescence vs. temperature, on the smallest number of axes that clearly convey the dataset. Include only data datasets generated by your own group.
    • On similary-grouped sets of axes, plot ΔdsDNA fraction/Δtemperature.
  3. Model parameters
    • Develop a model for the melting experiment and use nonlinear regression to determine best-fit parameters.
    • Explain the model parameters using bullet points.
    • Include a table of model parameters and confidence intervals for each experimental run.
    • Use the smallest possible number of fluorescence voltage vs. temperature plots to compare the model with best-fit parameters to your data and a simulated result obtained from DINAmelt or another melting curve simulator.
    • Plot one of the following:
      • residuals versus time, temperature, and fluorescence, or
      • use best-fit parameters to transform the fluorescence voltage into dsDNA fraction versus temperature for at least one experimental run.
    • Comment on strengths and shortcomings of the model.
      • Discuss validity of underlying assumptions.
      • Discuss the residuals (or transformed data) plot and parameter confidence intervals.
  4. Unknown sample determination:
    • Plot results for unknown sample, including other samples for comparison.
    • Identify your unknown sample and state your level of confidence in the answer.
    • Use the smallest possible number of plots to compare the unknown sample to the corresponding known sample.
  5. Results and discussion
    • Include a table of estimated thermodynamic parameters, ΔH, ΔS, and Tm. Use multiple methods to find Tm.
    • Compare your data to results from other groups or instructor data.
  6. Analysis
    • Use bullet points to explain your data analysis methodology.
  7. Error sources
    • Discuss important error sources.
    • Indicate whether each source causes a systematic or random distortion in the data.
    • Consider the entire system: the oligos, dye, the experimental method, and the analysis methodology.
    • Present error sources in a table, if you like.
  8. Instrument documentation
    • Document the electronic and optical systems.
    • Include component values, gain values, cutoff frequencies, lens focal lengths, and relevant distances.
    • It is not necessary to document construction details.
    • Why not include a nice snapshot or two of the instrument?
    • Signal to noise results
    • Give a bullet point summary of changes you made to your instrument design to address problems in the lab.

Lab manual sections