Difference between revisions of "DNA Melting Report Requirements"

From Course Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Report outline)
(Report outline)
Line 34: Line 34:
 
# Discussion
 
# Discussion
 
#* Compare your results to theoretical models and/or other group's datasets.
 
#* Compare your results to theoretical models and/or other group's datasets.
* Error sources
+
# Error sources
 
#* Discuss important error sources.  
 
#* Discuss important error sources.  
 
#* Indicate whether each source causes a systematic or random distortion in the data.  
 
#* Indicate whether each source causes a systematic or random distortion in the data.  

Revision as of 01:53, 16 November 2012

20.309: Biological Instrumentation and Measurement

ImageBar 774.jpg


Format

  • One group member must submit a single PDF file no more than 20 MB to Stellar before the deadline.
  • The name of the submitted file must consist of the last name of each group member separated by underscores: <LastName1>_<LastName2>_<LastName2>.pdf
  • Include computer code in an appendix at the end of the file. Do not submit code separately.
  • All plots must be presented properly, including a descriptive title, axis labels, and legend.
  • Begin the report with a cover page the lists the full names of all group members, your assigned DNA sample number, the type of investigation (length/ionic strength/complementarity), and a haiku about DNA melting curves.


Failure to follow the format guidelines will result in ridiculously large grade penalties

Report outline

  1. Abstract:
    • In one paragraph of less than six sentences, summarize the investigation you undertook and key results.
  2. Raw data
    • Plot all of your group's raw data, fluorescence vs. temperature, on the smallest number of axes that clearly convey the dataset. Include only data datasets generated by your own group.
    • On similary-grouped sets of axes, plot ΔdsDNA fraction/Δtemperature.
  3. Model parameters
    • Develop a model for the melting experiment and use nonlinear regression to determine best-fit parameters.
    • Explain the model parameters using bullet points.
    • Use the smallest possible number of plots to compare the model with best-fit parameters to your data and a simulated result obtained from DINAmelt or another melting curve simulator.
    • Include a table of estimated thermodynamic parameters, ΔH, ΔS, and Tm. Use multiple methods to find Tm.
  4. Unknown sample determination:
    • Plot results for unknown sample, including other samples for comparison.
    • Identify your unknown sample and state your level of confidence in the answer.
    • Use the smallest possible number of plots to compare the unknown sample to the corresponding known sample.
  5. Comparative data analysis
    • Compare your data to results from other groups or instructor data.
  6. Analysis
    • Use bullet points to explain your data analysis methodology.
  7. Discussion
    • Compare your results to theoretical models and/or other group's datasets.
  8. Error sources
    • Discuss important error sources.
    • Indicate whether each source causes a systematic or random distortion in the data.
    • Consider the entire system, including all aspects of your instrument, the oligo design, the dye used, the experimental methodology, and the analysis methodology.
    • Present error sources in a table, if you like.
  9. Instrument documentation
    • Document the electronic and optical systems.
    • Include component values, gain values, cutoff frequencies, lens focal lengths, and relevant distances.
    • It is not necessary to document construction details.
    • Why not include a nice snapshot or two of the instrument?
    • Signal to noise results
    • Give a bullet point summary of changes you made to your instrument design to address problems in the lab.

Lab manual sections