Difference between revisions of "Limits of Detection:Report Requirements"

From Course Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Guidelines)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
{{Template:20.309}}
 
{{Template:20.309}}
  
==Guidelines==
+
* Before you go to the lab, read the [http://measure.mit.edu/~20.309/wiki/images/2/27/Optical_Trapping_Lab_Manual.pdf optical trapping lab manual] and the the [http://measure.mit.edu/~20.309/wiki/index.php?title=Lab_Manual:Atomic_Force_Microscopy_(AFM) Atomic Force Microscopy lab manual]
#Carefully read sections in the Optical Trapping and Atomic Force Microscopy lab manuals, as guided by your TA. It would be a good idead to read as much as possible from the manuals before your lab sessions with the TA.
+
*Attend an optical trap lab session during the week of 11/28-12/3.
#Gather data as a group, but complete these deliverables <b>individually</b>. This includes both your code and your written report.
+
*Attend an AFM lab session during the week of 12/5-12/9.
#Upload your code and report as <b>separate</b> documents on Stellar. (Include your name in the filename as usual.)
+
*The mini-lab report will be due at midnight on 12/14.
#Write no more than one paragraph when comments are requested. That means your report will be only three paragraphs long, plus graphs.
+
*The report should be answer-book style, like a problem set.
#Include plots of your raw data and any additional plots to support your answers.
+
*Your report should be in PDF format, submitted to Stellar prior to the deadline. Submit ALL of your computer code (.m files) you use in your analysis as a single zip file to Stellar.
  
==Deliverables==
+
'''''You will gather data as a group; however, the report you submit must be entirely your own work. Everything in your report, including computer code, must be entirely your own work.'''''
  
===Optical trap exercise===
+
#Optical trap calibration
After working with your TA to gather data, work through Section 4 of the Optical Trapping lab manual and include the following in your Limits of Detection report.
+
##What is your estimate of the trap stiffness as a function of power as determined by the three different calibration methods (equipartition, PSD roll-off, and Stokes drag)?
#Report your results for trap stiffness by each of the three methods at the same power level: equipartition, PSD roll-off, and Stokes drag.
+
##Which method is superior? Explain why.
#Comment on which method you believe to be the best and provide support using concepts that we've discussed in class and in lab both recently and throughout the semester.
+
##What is the minimum detectable force as a function of power and bandwidth?
#Report the minimum detectable force in a 100 Hz bandwidth, at your power level.
+
#AFM
#Submit all code used to arrive at your results.
+
##What is the stiffness of the cantilever you measured?
 
+
##How does the stiffness compare to the value computed from the cantilever's material properties?
===Atomic force microscope exercise===
+
##What is the smallest detectable force using that cantiliver?
#Report your results for cantilever stiffness
+
##How you could modify the cantilever design to detect smaller forces? What is the smallest detectable force that could practically be detected using a silicon nitride cantilever?
#Report the minimum detectable force in a 100 Hz bandwidth if one were to use the cantilever you measured.
+
##How does the minimum detectable force compare to typical forces in biological systems (e.g. antibody/antigen binding, DNA hybridization, interdomain forces in proteins, etc.)?
#Comment on how this value compares to typical forces in biological systems (e.g. antibody/antigen binding, DNA hybridization, interdomain forces in proteins, etc.)? Use whatever knowledge you may have, or find one or two examples, but don't spend long doing literature searches.
+
#Comment on how you could modify the cantilever to detect smaller forces and state what you believe to be the smallest detectable force using a silicon nitride cantilever. Which parameters most affect the minimum detectable force? I.e. for smaller forces, do you need a cantilever that's shorter? thinner? wider? Comment on which parameter variations will have the greatest effect. Do you see any constraints on these parameters?
+
#Submit all code used to arrive at your results.
+

Revision as of 03:20, 1 December 2011

20.309: Biological Instrumentation and Measurement

ImageBar 774.jpg


  • Before you go to the lab, read the optical trapping lab manual and the the Atomic Force Microscopy lab manual
  • Attend an optical trap lab session during the week of 11/28-12/3.
  • Attend an AFM lab session during the week of 12/5-12/9.
  • The mini-lab report will be due at midnight on 12/14.
  • The report should be answer-book style, like a problem set.
  • Your report should be in PDF format, submitted to Stellar prior to the deadline. Submit ALL of your computer code (.m files) you use in your analysis as a single zip file to Stellar.

You will gather data as a group; however, the report you submit must be entirely your own work. Everything in your report, including computer code, must be entirely your own work.

  1. Optical trap calibration
    1. What is your estimate of the trap stiffness as a function of power as determined by the three different calibration methods (equipartition, PSD roll-off, and Stokes drag)?
    2. Which method is superior? Explain why.
    3. What is the minimum detectable force as a function of power and bandwidth?
  2. AFM
    1. What is the stiffness of the cantilever you measured?
    2. How does the stiffness compare to the value computed from the cantilever's material properties?
    3. What is the smallest detectable force using that cantiliver?
    4. How you could modify the cantilever design to detect smaller forces? What is the smallest detectable force that could practically be detected using a silicon nitride cantilever?
    5. How does the minimum detectable force compare to typical forces in biological systems (e.g. antibody/antigen binding, DNA hybridization, interdomain forces in proteins, etc.)?