Search results

Jump to: navigation, search
  • Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(F15):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | stateme
    8 KB (1,190 words) - 18:12, 9 November 2015
  • '''''You will complete this assignment with your partner.''''' Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(F15):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | stateme Be sure to review the class late policy [[20.109(F15): Assignments | ('''link''')]] as well a
    10 KB (1,486 words) - 16:41, 7 October 2015
  • # Review the [[20.109(F15):Lab tour| lab orientation exercises]] to prepare for the #*Review the [http://openwetware.org/wiki/20.109%28F15%29:Guidelines_for_writing_up_
    28 KB (4,514 words) - 20:04, 2 December 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th * Read a recent review paper in an area that interests you. This approach is one of the quickest w
    14 KB (2,363 words) - 18:50, 30 November 2015
  • ===Part 2: Research proposal review exercise===
    7 KB (1,140 words) - 11:40, 4 September 2015
  • ===Part 2: Peer review exercise===
    3 KB (470 words) - 11:40, 4 September 2015
  • Be sure to review the class late policy [[20.109(F15): Assignments | ('''link''')]] as well a
    5 KB (708 words) - 13:23, 17 October 2015
  • ===Part 2: Research proposal review exercise=== '''Outline of the peer review exercise:'''
    10 KB (1,568 words) - 21:55, 18 November 2015
  • #Review the template sheet of the Excel file.
    9 KB (1,418 words) - 18:31, 2 December 2015
  • *Review each of your main “messages”
    5 KB (896 words) - 16:07, 9 December 2015
  • '''''You will complete this assignment with your partner.''''' Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(S16):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | stateme Be sure to review the class late policy [[20.109(S16): Assignments | ('''link''')]] as well a
    9 KB (1,392 words) - 20:18, 29 February 2016
  • ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant.
    21 KB (3,265 words) - 15:35, 7 April 2016
  • Be sure to review the class late policy [[20.109(S16): Assignments | ('''link''')]] as well a
    4 KB (661 words) - 19:42, 15 February 2016
  • Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(S16):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | stateme
    11 KB (1,619 words) - 16:17, 14 April 2016
  • * Read a recent review paper in an area that interests you. This approach is one of the quickest w ...rts in an area that interests you. More fun and interactive than reading a review paper for honing in on research gaps! But don't expect them to do all the w
    12 KB (1,985 words) - 17:47, 25 April 2016
  • ===Part 2: Research proposal review exercise=== '''Outline of the peer review exercise:'''
    9 KB (1,567 words) - 22:07, 10 December 2015
  • #Review the template sheet of the Excel file.
    8 KB (1,384 words) - 17:28, 5 May 2016
  • #*Review Fig. 3. In the results section, the authors state that the "SF2 values cal #*Review Fig. 4 and 5. What do these data suggest concerning the role of DNA-PK in
    16 KB (2,780 words) - 17:34, 19 September 2016
  • ...te!''' We will store these samples at -80 &deg;C in case your Western blot needs to be repeated. #*'''Hint:''' Review the M2D3 page and consider the size of the nonsense insert fragment.
    21 KB (3,393 words) - 15:00, 11 March 2016
  • Review the following inhibitors, then sign up on the [http://engineerbiology.org/w ...er well in a 24-well dish ~48 h in advance of today's laboratory session. Review the plating schematic for your experiment that is shown below and be sure t
    16 KB (2,542 words) - 18:34, 28 March 2016

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)