Difference between revisions of "20.109(S13):Preparing cells for analysis (Day4)"
From Course Wiki
(→Part 3: RNA isolation and measurement) |
MAXINE JONAS (Talk | contribs) m (29 revisions: Transfer 20.109(S13) to HostGator) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<div style="padding: 10px; width: 640px; border: 5px solid #99FF66;"> | <div style="padding: 10px; width: 640px; border: 5px solid #99FF66;"> | ||
− | <font color=red> | + | <font color=red>Done. Light edits completed Monday morning.</font color> |
==Introduction== | ==Introduction== | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
When measuring changes in gene expression, primer design must be appropriate for a cDNA rather than genomic DNA. For example, a single primer that includes sequence from two neighbouring exons (along with a second primer that has sequence from just one exon) will amplify mRNA but not genomic DNA, which may be present as a contaminant (see also figure at right). What will happen if each primer contains sequence from only one exon? Primer design and quality control for qPCR also entail further consideration, particularly if tagged primers are used. In our case, the true efficiency of the primers needed to be measured (maximum efficiency is 2, i.e., perfectly exponential growth) to enable later quantification of transcript level changes. You will learn more about qPCR analysis in the coming week. | When measuring changes in gene expression, primer design must be appropriate for a cDNA rather than genomic DNA. For example, a single primer that includes sequence from two neighbouring exons (along with a second primer that has sequence from just one exon) will amplify mRNA but not genomic DNA, which may be present as a contaminant (see also figure at right). What will happen if each primer contains sequence from only one exon? Primer design and quality control for qPCR also entail further consideration, particularly if tagged primers are used. In our case, the true efficiency of the primers needed to be measured (maximum efficiency is 2, i.e., perfectly exponential growth) to enable later quantification of transcript level changes. You will learn more about qPCR analysis in the coming week. | ||
− | Next time (day 5) | + | Next time (day 5) we ll initiate an assay called ELISA to observe collagen at the protein (rather than transcript) level and also begin analysis of the data collected thus far. |
==Protocols== | ==Protocols== | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
Before (second TC cohort) or after (first TC cohort) your wet-lab work today, take some time to discuss the five research results you wrote up for homework with your lab partner, guided by the instructions below. | Before (second TC cohort) or after (first TC cohort) your wet-lab work today, take some time to discuss the five research results you wrote up for homework with your lab partner, guided by the instructions below. | ||
− | Writing a research proposal requires that you identify an interesting topic, spend lots of time learning about it, and then design some clever experiments to advance the field. It also requires that you articulate your ideas so any reader is convinced of your expertise, your creativity and the significance of your findings, should you have the opportunity to carry out the experiments | + | Writing a research proposal requires that you identify an interesting topic, spend lots of time learning about it, and then design some clever experiments to advance the field. It also requires that you articulate your ideas so any reader is convinced of your expertise, your creativity and the significance of your findings, should you have the opportunity to carry out the experiments you ve proposed. To begin you must identify your research question. This may be the hardest part and the most fun. Fortunately you started by finding a handful of topics to share with your lab partner. Today you should discuss and evaluate the topics you ve gathered. Consider them based on: |
* your interest in the topic | * your interest in the topic | ||
* the availability of good background information | * the availability of good background information | ||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
* if your proposal could be carried out in a reasonable amount of time and with non-infinite resources | * if your proposal could be carried out in a reasonable amount of time and with non-infinite resources | ||
− | It might be that not one of the topics | + | It might be that not one of the topics you ve identified is really suitable, in which case you should find some new ideas. It s also possible that through discussion with your lab partner, you ve found something new to consider. Both of these outcomes are fine but by the end of today s lab you should have settled on a general topic or two so you can begin the next step in your proposal writing, namely background reading and critical thinking about the topic. '''Check in with Thomas and get his feedback about your ideas for a few minutes before leaving today.''' |
A few ground rules that are 20.109 specific: | A few ground rules that are 20.109 specific: | ||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
*You should keep in mind that this proposal will be presented to the class, so try to limit your scope to an idea that can be convincingly presented in a twelve minute oral presentation. | *You should keep in mind that this proposal will be presented to the class, so try to limit your scope to an idea that can be convincingly presented in a twelve minute oral presentation. | ||
− | Once you and your partner have decided on a suitable research problem, | + | Once you and your partner have decided on a suitable research problem, it s time to become an expert on the topic. This will mean searching the literature, talking with people, generating some ideas and critically evaluating them. To keep track of your efforts, you should start a wiki catalog on your OpenWetWare user page. How you format the page is up to you but check out the [http://openwetware.org/wiki/Yeast_rebuild | |